| DGPI Result |
| Protein | Eten_8556_orf4 |
| Sequence | IRAWSCCTASCIASLTASVSALDRKGLRVFCCSSAAASASAAAAAAAAAVCCSCCPSCVSSKGHKGTLRFRKNASYASSCGSSSSSAAPLRPARAVRPMR |
| Length | 112 |
| Data from DGPI | N-term Signal : there is a N-term signal (1..38 in violet) maximal score=6.4 C-term Hydrophobicity profile : hydrophobe length (low-pass filter)=8 hydrophile length (low-pass filter)=21 hydrophobe length (median filter)=7 hydrophile length (median filter)=11 average hydrophobe length = 7.5 (in blue) average hydrophile length = 16.0 Cleavage site (w) : There's a GPI-anchor near 86 (7 aa after hydrophobic tail) There's a potential cleavage site at 86 (score=2.3220003) detected by w,w+2 rule. There's a potential cleavage site at 85 (score=3.7410002) detected by w,w+2 rule. There's a potential cleavage site at 84 (score=2.4940002) detected by w,w+2 rule. There's a potential cleavage site at 83 (score=2.4940002) detected by w,w+2 rule. There's a potential cleavage site at 82 (score=2.4940002) detected by w,w+2 rule. There's a potential cleavage site at 81 (score=0.696) detected by w,w+2 rule. There's a potential cleavage site at 80 (score=0.16000001) detected by w,w+2 rule. There's a potential cleavage site at 73 (score=0.684) detected by w,w+2 rule. The best cleavage site is 85 Conclusion : This protein is not GPI-anchored (C-terminal hydrophobic area is too short). There is a potential cleavage site at 85 (w, w+1, w+2 in red) |
| Sequence annotated by DGPI | IRAWSCCTASCIASLTASVSALDRKGLRVFCCSSAAASASAAAAAAAAAVCCSCCPSCVSSKGHKGTLRFRKNASYASSCGSSSSSAAPLRPARAVRPMR CTNTSGFCGGSI |