Search by key word or author


 
Contributed Papers: Oral Presentations
Mixed Cocciodiosis Control: Drugs and Vaccines

Coccidiosis in Turkeys: Patterns of sensitivity to diclazuril following vaccination with Coccivac-T vaccine

Marcelo Lang1; Steve Fitz-Coy
1corresponding author

A series of trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of Clinacox (diclazuril) in turkey flocks against isolates collected from farms using different control programs for coccidiosis. Isolates of coccidia were collected from farms that:
(1) Used only Coccivac-T vaccine in the year prior to collection
(2) Used Clinacox for six months, followed by an ionophore drug prior to collection
(3) Used Clinacox for six months, followed by Coccivac-T prior to collection.
Three groups of poults did not receive medication and were challenged with sporulated oocysts coming from each of the three sources (infected, unmedicated controls, IUC). Three groups of poults received feed with diclazuril and were inoculated with oocysts coming from one of the above sources. Another group received diclazuril-free feed and was not challenged, serving as the unmedicated, unchallenged control (UUC).
Growth rate at the end of 6 days post-challenge was depressed by an average of 37% on the IUC groups as compared to the UUC group. The average gross lesion score of IUC birds was 2.0 and a microscopic parasite score of 3.27 (range 0 to 4, the higher the score the greater the severity) was assessed, compared to no lesions and zero parasite burden in the UUC birds.
Index scores were determined using growth, gross lesions, microscopic parasitism and livability; A higher index score indicates better efficacy. The average indexes for the isolates obtained from source 1 were 40 and 96, for IUC and diclazuril medicated birds, respectively. The average score for the samples collected from source 2 were 35 and 60, for IUC and diclazuril medicated birds, respectively. The average score for the samples collected from source 3 were 35 and 86, for IUC and diclazuril medicated birds, respectively.
The infectivity of the isolates was severe and similar on the IUC birds regardless of source. On the other hand, the response of the isolates to medication with diclazuril was different. Birds challenged with isolates from sources 1 and 3 (where Coccivac-T vaccine had been used) showed better response to medication than birds challenged with isolates from source 2, where diclazuril had been used, but no vaccination was applied.
Using Coccivac-T vaccine in rotation with diclazuril appeared to provide a sparing effect on the efficacy of the drug.


 

back  |  print